arXiv:2607.20434v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As the parameter size of language models continues to grow, effective model compression is required to reduce their computational and memory…
arXiv:2509.14257v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Model agents achieve strong performance on multi-step reasoning and tool-use tasks, but their impressive capabilities typically rely on extremely…
arXiv:2607.21574v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Surprisal theory holds that the human processing difficulty of a linguistic unit in context is an affine function of its surprisal…
arXiv:2604.01925v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models increasingly suppress biased outputs when demographic identity is stated explicitly, yet may still exhibit implicit biases when identity…
arXiv:2607.20435v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open-source LLMs (OSMs)arereaching near state-of-the-art performance, prompting prior works to trace the text they generate by embedding text watermarking algorithms directly…
arXiv:2607.20864v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Position bias in multiple-choice LLM evaluation is widely cited as a confound in capability comparisons, but published measurements rely on single…
arXiv:2607.20491v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard evaluation benchmarks measure what a tool-using agent decides, not whether it arrives at that decision through the same process each…
arXiv:2607.21412v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at natural language understanding and generation but remain unreliable for multi-step logical reasoning, especially in safety-critical…
arXiv:2607.20436v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety evaluations often assume that behavior observed during testing reflects behavior in ordinary use, but fine-tuning can break this assumption. A…
arXiv:2607.20479v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Training probes to detect deceptive outputs from large language models is still an open problem. Recent work has demonstrated that detection…